Transload (YC P26) – Measuring freight items with CCTV
Hi HN — we’re Julius, Jago, and Nils, and we’re building transload (transload.io).transload helps LTL trucking companies measure freight dimensions using the security cameras already installed in their terminals. Instead of sending shipments through a dedicated dimensioning station, we measure them automatically as they move through the normal dock workflow.We’ve put together a small HN-specific demo site here: https://hn.transload.io/In LTL trucking, dimensions matter because they affect pricing, freight classification, and trailer utilization. If a shipment is larger than the shipper reported, the carrier may undercharge for it while still giving up the same amount of trailer space. The obvious fix is to measure every shipment, but that is surprisingly hard in a busy freight terminal. Dedicated dimensioning systems work for freight that passes through them, but they can add forklift travel, create dock congestion, and change the normal flow of work. In practice, many terminals only measure a sample of their shipments.Jago grew up close to this industry through his family’s LTL trucking and cross-docking business. We did not start out building freight dimensioning. Our first idea was an AI system for optimizing forklift routes inside cross-dock terminals. After spending time with customers and talking to more than 50 trucking companies, we realized that forklift routing was not the pain people kept bringing up. Freight dimensions were.At the same time, we saw that spatial AI was advancing quickly. Monocular metric depth estimation has become dramatically better, making it possible to recover accurate 3D structure from ordinary camera footage without expensive LiDAR sensors. MapAnything (https://github.com/facebookresearch/map-anything) and MoGe (https://github.com/microsoft/moge) are two examples.Freight terminals also have helpful structure: fixed cameras, repeated workflows, barcode scan timestamps, and known
FL score
out of 100
Verdict
high confidence
Competition
No competitor data yet
Trend
No signal yet
Use existing dock cameras and depth estimation AI to automatically measure freight dimensions without disrupting terminal workflows.
The pain
The gap
Build angle
Strengths
- Founders have direct industry access through family business, not outsiders guessing at trucking problems
- Validated problem through 50+ customer conversations before building, they pivoted away from forklift routing because this was the real pain
- Timing advantage: depth estimation models just became good enough; this window won't stay open long
- Low friction deployment: uses existing cameras, no hardware installation, integrates into normal dock flow
- Clear ROI: carriers can quantify revenue recovery from corrected pricing on underreported shipments
- Defensible: requires domain knowledge (terminal workflows, barcode integration, freight classification rules) plus AI expertise
Risks
- Accuracy threshold unknown: depth estimation works in lab conditions, but busy docks have occlusion, lighting variation, and fast-moving freight. Need to prove >95% accuracy on real shipments before customers trust pricing decisions.
- Integration complexity: each terminal has different TMS systems, barcode formats, and dock layouts. Sales cycle could be long and implementation heavy.
- Regulatory/liability: if measurements are wrong and affect pricing disputes, who bears the cost? Carriers may demand insurance or guarantees that kill unit economics.
- Competition from hardware: established players (Cubiscan, Mettler-Toledo) have relationships and proven accuracy. They could add AI to their systems faster than Transload scales.
- Customer concentration: LTL is fragmented but top 10 carriers control significant volume. Losing one large customer after deployment could crater revenue.
- Model drift: dock layouts change, cameras get moved, lighting conditions shift. Ongoing model maintenance and retraining could become a support burden.
Fly Labs Method
Is the pain real, is there a gap, is it the right time, can one person build it.
Value Equation
Dream outcome and how likely it feels, against the time and effort it costs.
One-Person Business
Curiosity pull, identity fit, and a path from free value to paid for a solo creator.
Viral Frameworks
Hook strength, shareability, and how cheaply it can be tested.
Builder Lens
Evidence the problem exists, timing, defensibility, and a model that fits on a napkin.
Five lenses, one composite. How scoring works
The angle
No market research recorded for this idea yet.
Semble – Code search for agents that uses 98% fewer tokens than grep
Hey HN! We (Stephan and Thomas) recently open-sourced Semble. We kept running into the same problem while using Claude Code on large codebases: when the agent can't find something directly, it falls back to grep, reading full files or launching subagents. This uses a lot of tokens, and often still misses the relevant code. There are existing tools for this, but they were either too slow to index on demand, needed API keys, or had poor retrieval quality.Semble is our solution for this. It combines static Model2Vec embeddings (using our latest static model: potion-code-16M) with BM25, fused via RRF and reranked with code-aware signals. Everything runs on CPU since there's no transformers involved. On our benchmark of ~1250 query/document pairs across 63 repos and 19 languages, it uses 98% fewer tokens than grep+read and reaches 99% of the retrieval quality of a 137M-parameter code-trained transformer, while being ~200x faster.Main features:- Token-efficient: 98% fewer tokens than grep+read- Fast: ~250ms to index a typical repo on our benchmark, ~1.5ms per query on CPU (very large repos may take longer)- Accurate: 0.854 NDCG@10, 99% of the best transformer setup we tested- MCP server: drop-in for Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, OpenCode- Zero config: no API keys, no GPU, no external servicesInstall in Claude Code with: claude mcp add semble -s user -- uvx --from "semble[mcp]" sembleOr check our README for other installation instructions, benchmarks, and methodology:Semble: https://github.com/MinishLab/sembleBenchmarks: https://github.com/MinishLab/semble/tree/main/benchmarksModel: https://huggingface.co/minishlab/potion-code-16MLet us know if you have any feedback or questions!
AI
Postgres extension for BM25 relevance-ranked full-text search
Last summer we faced a conundrum at my company, Tiger Data, a Postgres cloud vendor whose main business is in timeseries data. We were trying to grow our business towards emerging AI-centric workloads and wanted to provide a state-of-the-art hybrid search stack in Postgres. We'd already built pgvectorscale in house with the goal of scaling semantic search beyond pgvector's main memory limitations. We just needed a scalable ranked keyword search solution too.The problem: core Postgres doesn't provide this; the leading Postgres BM25 extension, ParadeDB, is guarded behind AGPL; developing our own extension appeared daunting. We'd need a small team of sharp engineers and 6-12 months, I figured. And we'd probably still fall short of the performance of a mature system like Parade/Tantivy.Or would we? I'd be experimenting long enough with AI-boosted development at that point to realize that with the latest tools (Claude Code + Opus) and an experienced hand (I've been working in database systems internals for 25 years now), the old time estimates pretty much go out the window.I told our CTO I thought I could solo the project in one quarter. This raised some eyebrows.It did take a little more time than that (two quarters), and we got some real help from the community (amazing!) after open-sourcing the pre-release. But I'm thrilled/exhausted today to share that pg_textsearch v1.0 is freely available via open source (Postgres license), on Tiger Data cloud, and hopefully soon, a hyperscalar near you:https://github.com/timescale/pg_textsearchIn the blog post accompanying the release, I overview the architecture and present benchmark results using MS-MARCO. To my surprise, we were not only able to meet Parade/Tantivy's query performance, but exceed it substantially, measuring a 4.7x advantage on query throughput at scale:https://www.tigerdata.com/blog/pg-textsearch-bm25-fu
AI
Consus (YC F24) – LLM gateway for companies handling sensitive data
Hey Hacker News! I'm Eric, the founder of Consus. We route all AI requests to ITAR restricted and controlled unclassified information (CUI) compliant infrastructure. Consus itself satisfies ITAR restrictions, and we recently completed our FedRAMP equivalency audit against the 410 FedRAMP High controls. FedRAMP High is the U.S. government’s strictest security baseline for cloud services handling sensitive unclassified data. A breach of this data could cause severe or catastrophic harm. Achieving FedRAMP equivalency, or authorization, is required before processing CUI information.Demo: https://youtu.be/6MYxJe6P4oYAerospace and defense is experiencing rapid growth. Unfortunately, most companies are struggling to use AI because of necessary data protections & compliance risk. These companies can move even faster if they could use the AI tools that most other industries take for granted.I spent most of my career prior to Consus in aerospace & defense. I launched national security payloads at SpaceX, and was an early employee at Castelion. I’ve watched first hand how compliance red-tape makes it difficult for companies to adopt new technologies and trust vendors that touch their sensitive data. For example, I worked with a satellite manufacturer that doesn’t allow any AI tools, even for non-sensitive work.Even as AI has become extremely useful over the past 9-12 months, I was surprised by how many aerospace & defense companies refused to touch it. They could see how it could be helpful, but they were scared about model providers training on their data, violating an ITAR rule, or risk losing new business because of a failed cyber assessment. These are all rational fears.There were a lot of ways to solve some/all of these problems, but we focused on building a compliant AI inference layer that can "plug" into any AI tool or workflow. Just as OpenRouter integrates with most tools, Consus can connect to tools like ChatGPT or Clau
AI
Questions about this idea?
FlyBot reads the scoring and gives you a second opinion on “Transload (YC P26) – Measuring freight items with CCTV”.