Ideas Lab

Real problems people complain about online, pulled every morning and scored out of 100. Build, validate, or skip. How scoring works

Ideas
4,534
BUILD
695
Sources
8
Last sync
14h ago
4,534 ideas

How much should I pay for the given website.

Project Title: Micro-Task Platform Project Overview Build a web platform where clients can create online tasks and workers can complete them to earn money. Workers submit proof, tasks are verified automatically or manually, and earnings are credited to their wallet. The platform must support crypto withdrawals and an admin management system. User Roles 1. Worker - Create account and login - View available tasks - Complete tasks and submit proof (link or screenshot) - Track earnings and task history - Request withdrawals 2. Client - Create campaigns/tasks - Set reward amount per task - Define number of workers required - Track task completion statistics - Pay for campaigns 3. Admin - Approve or reject task submissions - Manage users - Manage campaigns - Process withdrawals - Monitor platform activity Core Features User System - Registration and login - Email verification - User dashboard - Wallet balance display Task System - Task listing page - Task instructions page - Proof submission (URL or screenshot upload) - Task status tracking (pending / approved / rejected) Verification System - Automatic link validation for tasks when possible - Manual admin approval for complex tasks Wallet System - User balance management - Earnings credited after task approval - Withdrawal request system Payments - Crypto payments (USDT, BTC, ETH) - Admin manual approval for withdrawals Admin Dashboard - View all users - Manage tasks - Approve submissions - Approve withdrawals - Platform analytics Security & Anti-Fraud - Duplicate submission detection - Rate limiting for tasks - IP monitoring for multiple accounts Technical Requirements Frontend Responsive web interface. Backend API based architecture. Database Store users, tasks, submissions, and transactions. Optional Features (Phase 2) - Automated verification via social platform APIs - Referral system - Reputation score for workers - Automated crypto payouts - Real-time notifications

Reddit7mo agoToolDev

59FL score
1Sign in to vote

outsourced our phone answering to save time and now we're spending more time fixing the notes than we saved

We run a small insurance agency and phones are the biggest time suck in the office. Figured we'd try one of those call answering services to handle the easy stuff while we focus on quotes and renewals. Three weeks in it's a mess. The operators keep mixing up policy numbers and claim numbers in the notes they send us, carrier names are misspelled half the time, and if a client asks anything slightly specific they just transfer the call right back to us. So we're paying for a service that handles maybe 20% of calls on its own and creates cleanup work for the rest. One call really got me. Commercial client called about adding a location to their bop. Notes came back saying "customer wants to add a body shop to their policy." I still don't understand how you get there from what was actually said. Another time someone called about their personal umbrella policy and the only note was "customer has question about umbrella insurance." Zero context, zero details, so we had to call the client back and redo the whole conversation. The frustrating part is the terminology isn't even that complicated once you learn it but these generic services clearly don't train their people on any of it. I'm pulling the plug this week. Been poking around at some of the industry specific options, saw a few names come up like sonant and a couple others that are supposedly trained on insurance calls specifically but honestly at this point I'm skeptical anything that isn't our own staff will get it right. Anyone else dealt with this when trying to automate or outsource something in a specialized field? feels like the generic tools just don't cut it when there's real domain knowledge involved.

Reddit7mo agoToolProductivity

78FL score
1Sign in to vote

Pulse Local, a Mac budgeting app whose AI models run on your machine

Hi HN, I'm Niz. Pulse Local is a budgeting app for Mac (Apple Silicon, beta) that answers questions about your spending with models that run on your machine. Local mode needs no account. The ledger and your questions stay on the machine, and the app sends no analytics or crash logs.I felt there are not enough consumer apps that run locally with no calls to the outside world that help us manage sensitive corners of our lives. This app in its local variant only downloads a couple of models and occasional updates, it does not send any analytics nor data.Features-wise, Pulse local is a complete budgeting app that offers an assistant built on top of a fine-tuned model and thousands of rules embedded in the code itself. I'm sharing it for free with options to help me continue experimenting with fine-tuning and expanding along this direction.How it works: you import a CSV from any bank, in any currency. When you ask a question, a tuned Qwen3 0.6B model reads it into a structured query, and code, not the model, does the money math against the ledger. A 4B checker model double-checks each money answer; when the two readings disagree, the app says it is not sure instead of guessing. That change took wrong answers from about one in five to 5 in 494 questions across our last three tests. The write-up covers how we test, the designs that failed, and the limits of the claim: https://pulseos.finance/pulse-local/writing/agree-or-not-sur...The tuned weights are on Hugging Face (PulseOS/pulse-local-qwen3-0.6b).Limitations: the first start downloads about 2.9 GB of models. With the checker on, a money answer takes 12 to 14 seconds (you can turn the checker off). Small models can still misread an open-ended question. The app answers in English. Mac only for now; Windows is next.The app is free. An optional Connected mode (Sync Pass, $29/year) syncs US banks through Plaid; transactions pass through our server's memory and are not stored.

Hacker News21h agoToolAI

75FL score
0Sign in to vote