Hi HN, I’m Alberto. I co-founded Didit (https://didit.me) with my identical twin brother Alejandro. We are building a unified identity layer—a single integration that handles KYC, AML, biometrics, authentication, and fraud prevention globally. Here’s a demo: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eTdcg7JCc4M&t=7s.Being identical twins, we’ve spent our whole lives dealing with identity confusion, so it is a bit of irony that we ended up building a company to solve it for the internet.Growing up in Barcelona, we spent years working on products where identity issues were a massive pain. We eventually realized that for most engineering teams, "global identity" is a fiction—in reality it is a fragmented mess. You end up stitching together one provider for US driver's licenses, another for NFC chip extraction in Europe, a third for AML screening, a fourth for government database validation in Brazil, a fifth for liveness detection on low-end Android devices, and yet another for biometric authentication and age estimation. Orchestrating these into a cohesive flow while adapting to localized regulations like GDPR or CCPA is a nightmare that makes no sense for most teams to be working on.When we looked at the existing "enterprise" solutions, we were baffled. Most require a three-week sales cycle just to see a single page of documentation. Pricing is hidden behind "Contact Us" buttons, and the products themselves are often bloated legacy systems with high latency and abysmal accuracy.We also noticed a recurring pattern: these tools are frequently optimized only for the latest iOS hardware, performing poorly on the mid-range or older Android devices that make up a huge percentage of the market. This results in a "leaky" funnel where legitimate users drop off due to technical friction and fraud goes undetected because data points are spread across disparate systems. Also, these systems are expensive, often requi
FL score
out of 100
Verdict
high confidence
Competition
15
competitors found, emerging market, big tech present, funded players
Trend
6 community mentions
A critical problem in identity verification for businesses, but too complex, resource-intensive, and competitive for a solo builder.
The pain
The gap
Build angle
Strengths
Questions about this idea?
FlyBot reads the scoring and gives you a second opinion on “Didit (YC W26) – Stripe for Identity Verification”.
Risks
Next steps
Fly Labs Method
Is the pain real, is there a gap, is it the right time, can one person build it.
High pain, high willingness to pay, but extreme build complexity and crowded market for a solo builder.
Value Equation
Dream outcome and how likely it feels, against the time and effort it costs.
Strong market pain and growth, but highly complex to build and compete against incumbents.
One-Person Business
Curiosity pull, identity fit, and a path from free value to paid for a solo creator.
Clear problem, but too complex and resource-intensive for a solo founder.
Viral Frameworks
Hook strength, shareability, and how cheaply it can be tested.
Clear value proposition for a complex problem, but poor fit for micro-SaaS distribution and solo build.
Builder Lens
Evidence the problem exists, timing, defensibility, and a model that fits on a napkin.
High demand and problem severity, but too broad and unproven for a solo builder's narrow wedge.
Why this verdict
Five lenses, one composite. How scoring works
The angle
This weekend
Who is already there, emerging market
Stripe's own KYC and identity verification API integrated with payments.
Pricing: $800/mo or per verification
Decentralized reusable identity platform for web3 KYC/AML, verify once use everywhere, privacy-preserving.
Pricing: unknown
Free age verification and KYC API for startups needing compliance.
Pricing: free for startups
Reusable KYC with Autonomous ID Vault, zero-knowledge proofs for privacy.
Pricing: unknown
Decentralized Identity (SDI) for KYC compliance with privacy and anti-bot.
Pricing: unknown
AI Agent for end-to-end KYC verification automation.
Pricing: unknown
A leading provider of identity verification solutions, offering identity verification, document verification, authentication, AML screening, and proof of residence.
Pricing: Customized based on services and volume, with identity verification ranging from $1.00-$2.50 per transaction.
An identity verification platform providing identity and document verification, AML screening, biometric authentication, and fraud protection.
Pricing: Starts at $0.80 per verification with monthly minimums of $49 for the Essential plan, $1.39 with $99 for Plus, and $1.89 with $209 for Premium. Custom plans are also available.
A unified identity verification platform that helps businesses manage verification, combat fraud, and adhere to compliance standards like KYC and AML.
Pricing: Essential plan starts at $250/month for 500 free services, with additional services at $1.50 each. Growth and Enterprise plans offer custom pricing.
An identity verification solution provider that automates the verification process during customer onboarding, focusing on document and biometric verification.
Pricing: Custom pricing based on verification volume, type of services, geographical coverage, and business size. Median annual spend is approximately $60,475.
Not detailed in search results, but generally known as an identity verification platform with strong fraud prevention capabilities.
Pricing: Not explicitly stated in search results.
A global identity verification service providing instant online identity, document, and business verification for KYC and AML compliance across 195 countries.
Pricing: Entry-level pricing starts at approximately $99 USD per month, with variations based on transaction volume, geographic coverage, and verification type.
Gaps they leave open
What people say, 6 mentions
No, You Can’t Just Vibecode DocuSign
r/SaaS
What do you use to sell licenses for your desktop app? Lemon Squeezy was a nightmare.
r/SaaS
Solo Tech Founder Built This Trust/Verification SaaS
r/Entrepreneur
Identity Verification for P2P transactions
r/SaaS
I built an AI second brain before building my SaaS — here's the system and what I learned
r/SaaS
I niched down to one framework, one workflow, and one command.. here's why
r/SaaS
Recent news
Launch HN: Didit (YC W26) – Stripe for Identity Verification
Hacker News, March 10 2026
Didit Raises $2M & Joins Y Combinator W26!
Didit, December 02 2025
Market signals
The identity verification market is large and highly regulated, with increasing urgency due to deepfake and AI fraud, creating a strong demand for advanced NFC+biometric solutions, with EU regulatory tailwinds favoring certified players.
Last summer we faced a conundrum at my company, Tiger Data, a Postgres cloud vendor whose main business is in timeseries data. We were trying to grow our business towards emerging AI-centric workloads and wanted to provide a state-of-the-art hybrid search stack in Postgres. We'd already built pgvectorscale in house with the goal of scaling semantic search beyond pgvector's main memory limitations. We just needed a scalable ranked keyword search solution too.The problem: core Postgres doesn't provide this; the leading Postgres BM25 extension, ParadeDB, is guarded behind AGPL; developing our own extension appeared daunting. We'd need a small team of sharp engineers and 6-12 months, I figured. And we'd probably still fall short of the performance of a mature system like Parade/Tantivy.Or would we? I'd be experimenting long enough with AI-boosted development at that point to realize that with the latest tools (Claude Code + Opus) and an experienced hand (I've been working in database systems internals for 25 years now), the old time estimates pretty much go out the window.I told our CTO I thought I could solo the project in one quarter. This raised some eyebrows.It did take a little more time than that (two quarters), and we got some real help from the community (amazing!) after open-sourcing the pre-release. But I'm thrilled/exhausted today to share that pg_textsearch v1.0 is freely available via open source (Postgres license), on Tiger Data cloud, and hopefully soon, a hyperscalar near you:https://github.com/timescale/pg_textsearchIn the blog post accompanying the release, I overview the architecture and present benchmark results using MS-MARCO. To my surprise, we were not only able to meet Parade/Tantivy's query performance, but exceed it substantially, measuring a 4.7x advantage on query throughput at scale:https://www.tigerdata.com/blog/pg-textsearch-bm25-fu
AI
Hi HN!I recently switched from a Fedora/GNOME laptop to a MacBook Air. My old setup served me well as a portable workstation, but I’ve started traveling more while working remotely and needed something with similar performance but better battery life. The main thing I missed was a simple taskbar that shows the windows in the current workspace instead of a Dock that mixes everything together.I built boringBar so I would not have to use the Dock. It shows only the windows in the current Space, lets you switch Spaces by scrolling on the bar, and adds a desktop switcher so you can jump directly to any Space. You can also hide the system Dock, pin apps, preview windows with thumbnails, and launch apps from a searchable menu (I keep Spotlight disabled because for some reason it uses a lot of system resources on my machine).I’ve been dogfooding it for a few months now, and it finally felt polished enough to share.It’s for people who like macOS but want window management to feel a bit more like GNOME, Windows, or a traditional taskbar. It’s also for people like me who wanted an easier transition to macOS, especially now that Windows feels increasingly user-hostile.I’d love feedback on the UX, bugs, and whether this solves the same Dock/Spaces pain for anyone else.P.S. It might also appeal to people who feel nostalgic for the GNOME 2 desktop of yore. I started my Linux journey with it, and boringBar brings back some of that feeling for me.
AI
### Describe the project you are working on Godot C# bindings ### Describe the problem or limitation you are having in your project For the past weeks, I've been discussing with several Unity users intending to move to Godot C# regarding dealing with the C# garbage collector. The most common complaint I hear from users is that, in Unity, allocations can trigger unexpected GC spikes into the game. In Godot, we target to make all of the high performance APIs (those that intended to be called every frame) not allocate any memory, so theoretically the GC should not be a problem. Additionally, Godot starting from 4.0, uses the Microsoft CoreCLR version of .net, which also supposedly has a better garbage collector than Unity. But in all, after several discussions with Unity users, neither is enough reassurance for them, and they would really feel safer if Godot exposed a zero allocation API. ### Describe the feature / enhancement and how it helps to overcome the problem or limitation The idea of this proposal is that Godot exposes zero allocation versions of many functions in the C# API, that users can use if they desire. Technically, this could be done from the binding generator itself, without breaking compatibility, and without doing any modification to Godot itself. ### Describe how your proposal will work, with code, pseudo-code, mock-ups, and/or diagrams **WARNING** I am not familiar with C#, so take this as pseudocode. Imagine you have two functions exposed as to C#: ```C# void MyClass.SetArray( Vector2[] array); Vector2[] MyClass.GetArray(); ``` This works and is pretty and intuitive. However, it has two problems: * GC is allocated on return * Memory is copied to Godot native formats every time there is a call. The idea is to add NoAlloc versions, which can be generated directly by the binder automatically when required: ```C# void MyClass.SetArrayNoAlloc( Godot.Collections.PackedVector2Array array); void MyCl
AI