Fly Labs
Ask FlyBot

Building in public leads to public failure and hype optimization instead of real user focus

When building in public, founders hype launches and milestones for engagement, but when momentum inevitably stalls (as it does 99% of the time), the public watches the failure in real time, causing founders to optimize for applause rather than actual users.

XArticleOtherSource
0Sign in to voteCopy link

FL score

62

out of 100

Verdict

VALIDATE

low confidence

Competition

No competitor data yet

Trend

No signal yet

An article arguing that public building creates perverse incentives for founders to chase engagement metrics instead of solving real customer problems.

The pain

Founders who build publicly face social pressure to maintain momentum narratives. When growth stalls (the normal case), they either ghost their audience or pivot toward whatever generates engagement rather than what users actually need. This splits their focus between two incompatible goals: performing for an audience and shipping for customers.

The gap

There's no existing framework or resource that directly addresses the tension between transparency and focus. Most advice either says 'build in public' or 'stay heads-down,' but doesn't acknowledge that these create opposing incentive structures. Founders lack a decision tree for when each approach makes sense.

Build angle

Create a guide that maps specific founder stages and business models to whether building in public helps or hurts. Include case studies of founders who switched approaches mid-journey and why. Provide concrete metrics to track (user retention, revenue per customer) versus vanity metrics (followers, retweets). Offer templates for communicating progress without creating hype obligations.

Strengths

  • Addresses a real tension many founders experience but rarely discuss openly
  • Contrarian enough to cut through noise, but grounded in observable behavior
  • Applicable across industries and business models
  • Solves a timing/strategy problem rather than a technical one

Risks

  • Could be perceived as gatekeeping or anti-transparency, limiting audience buy-in
  • The core insight is relatively simple; expansion into a full product/course may feel thin
  • Founders who've already committed to public building may dismiss it as sour grapes
  • Hard to monetize as standalone content; works better as part of a larger founder education platform
  • Requires longitudinal data on founder outcomes to be truly credible; anecdotes alone won't convince skeptics

Questions about this idea?

FlyBot reads the scoring and gives you a second opinion on “Building in public leads to public failure and hype optimization instead of real user focus”.

Open FlyBot