Nari Qwen3-TTS and Qwen3-ASR – High accuracy, low latency and cost
Hey HN, Toby from Nari Labs here.We've been working on making OSS speech models super-fast. Last year, we built Dia, the first OSS text-to-speech model capable of doing natural dialogue. Since then, so many more great speech models have been released to the public.But the market is still dominated by closed source models. We think that's an inference problem. Existing systems such as vLLM / SGLang are not well suited for multimodal inference. To prove this, we built an inference engine specialized for Qwen3-TTS and open-sourced it (https://github.com/nari-labs/nari-qwen3-tts). Running at sub-50 ms latency at 10 RPS, this showed open models can be run much faster and cheaper.Since then, we've been working hard to bring cheap, fast, and high quality serving to all. And we've even beat closed models at their game!Measured on the highly cited Coval (YC S24) voice AI benchmarks, our Qwen3-TTS endpoint not just is #2 in latency, but #1 in accuracy (WER) compared to 11Labs, Cartesia etc. while being the cheapest endpoint. Our Qwen3-ASR endpoint has the lowest latency and #2 accuracy, just 0.1% away from #1. It is the second cheapest model on the list.It took a lot of clever inference engineering to make these models quick, perform well while keeping costs low. Interestingly, Alibaba's official endpoints seem to perform worse in terms of accuracy and latency compared to ours. But nonetheless, much love to the Qwen team for OSS-ing these amazing speech models.We want to continue to push prices down to make speech technology a commodity - so that every app can have great TTS and STT without worrying about unit costs. We're also working on other parts of audio such as diarization - as well as video and world model inference. More to come!
FL score
out of 100
Verdict
high confidence
Competition
No competitor data yet
Trend
No signal yet
Inference optimization layer for open-source speech models that undercuts closed competitors on latency, accuracy, and cost.
The pain
The gap
Build angle
Strengths
- Benchmarked proof of superiority on neutral third-party metrics (Coval), not internal tests
- Already operating endpoints at scale with real performance data, not a prototype
- Clear unit economics advantage: cheaper to run than competitors, can undercut pricing and still be profitable
- Timing: Qwen3 just released, market hasn't optimized for it yet, first-mover advantage in inference
- Extensible platform: diarization, video, world models mentioned suggest they can expand TAM
- Open-source components lower barrier to adoption and build community moat
Risks
- Model performance is a moving target—if Alibaba or OpenAI optimize their inference, the latency/cost advantage shrinks
- Dependent on open-source model releases; if Qwen stops improving or loses adoption, the business loses its technical foundation
- Sales and distribution are hard; existing customers have switching costs and relationships with incumbents
- Inference optimization is a commodity skill—larger players (AWS, Google, Anthropic) could replicate this in weeks if they prioritize it
- Pricing pressure: if they undercut incumbents, incumbents can match or undercut them back; race to zero margin
- Regulatory/licensing: unclear if Alibaba's model license permits commercial inference optimization and resale
- Customer acquisition cost could be high if they need to educate market on open-source speech quality
Fly Labs Method
Is the pain real, is there a gap, is it the right time, can one person build it.
Value Equation
Dream outcome and how likely it feels, against the time and effort it costs.
One-Person Business
Curiosity pull, identity fit, and a path from free value to paid for a solo creator.
Viral Frameworks
Hook strength, shareability, and how cheaply it can be tested.
Builder Lens
Evidence the problem exists, timing, defensibility, and a model that fits on a napkin.
Five lenses, one composite. How scoring works
The angle
No market research recorded for this idea yet.
Semble – Code search for agents that uses 98% fewer tokens than grep
Hey HN! We (Stephan and Thomas) recently open-sourced Semble. We kept running into the same problem while using Claude Code on large codebases: when the agent can't find something directly, it falls back to grep, reading full files or launching subagents. This uses a lot of tokens, and often still misses the relevant code. There are existing tools for this, but they were either too slow to index on demand, needed API keys, or had poor retrieval quality.Semble is our solution for this. It combines static Model2Vec embeddings (using our latest static model: potion-code-16M) with BM25, fused via RRF and reranked with code-aware signals. Everything runs on CPU since there's no transformers involved. On our benchmark of ~1250 query/document pairs across 63 repos and 19 languages, it uses 98% fewer tokens than grep+read and reaches 99% of the retrieval quality of a 137M-parameter code-trained transformer, while being ~200x faster.Main features:- Token-efficient: 98% fewer tokens than grep+read- Fast: ~250ms to index a typical repo on our benchmark, ~1.5ms per query on CPU (very large repos may take longer)- Accurate: 0.854 NDCG@10, 99% of the best transformer setup we tested- MCP server: drop-in for Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, OpenCode- Zero config: no API keys, no GPU, no external servicesInstall in Claude Code with: claude mcp add semble -s user -- uvx --from "semble[mcp]" sembleOr check our README for other installation instructions, benchmarks, and methodology:Semble: https://github.com/MinishLab/sembleBenchmarks: https://github.com/MinishLab/semble/tree/main/benchmarksModel: https://huggingface.co/minishlab/potion-code-16MLet us know if you have any feedback or questions!
AI
Postgres extension for BM25 relevance-ranked full-text search
Last summer we faced a conundrum at my company, Tiger Data, a Postgres cloud vendor whose main business is in timeseries data. We were trying to grow our business towards emerging AI-centric workloads and wanted to provide a state-of-the-art hybrid search stack in Postgres. We'd already built pgvectorscale in house with the goal of scaling semantic search beyond pgvector's main memory limitations. We just needed a scalable ranked keyword search solution too.The problem: core Postgres doesn't provide this; the leading Postgres BM25 extension, ParadeDB, is guarded behind AGPL; developing our own extension appeared daunting. We'd need a small team of sharp engineers and 6-12 months, I figured. And we'd probably still fall short of the performance of a mature system like Parade/Tantivy.Or would we? I'd be experimenting long enough with AI-boosted development at that point to realize that with the latest tools (Claude Code + Opus) and an experienced hand (I've been working in database systems internals for 25 years now), the old time estimates pretty much go out the window.I told our CTO I thought I could solo the project in one quarter. This raised some eyebrows.It did take a little more time than that (two quarters), and we got some real help from the community (amazing!) after open-sourcing the pre-release. But I'm thrilled/exhausted today to share that pg_textsearch v1.0 is freely available via open source (Postgres license), on Tiger Data cloud, and hopefully soon, a hyperscalar near you:https://github.com/timescale/pg_textsearchIn the blog post accompanying the release, I overview the architecture and present benchmark results using MS-MARCO. To my surprise, we were not only able to meet Parade/Tantivy's query performance, but exceed it substantially, measuring a 4.7x advantage on query throughput at scale:https://www.tigerdata.com/blog/pg-textsearch-bm25-fu
AI
Consus (YC F24) – LLM gateway for companies handling sensitive data
Hey Hacker News! I'm Eric, the founder of Consus. We route all AI requests to ITAR restricted and controlled unclassified information (CUI) compliant infrastructure. Consus itself satisfies ITAR restrictions, and we recently completed our FedRAMP equivalency audit against the 410 FedRAMP High controls. FedRAMP High is the U.S. government’s strictest security baseline for cloud services handling sensitive unclassified data. A breach of this data could cause severe or catastrophic harm. Achieving FedRAMP equivalency, or authorization, is required before processing CUI information.Demo: https://youtu.be/6MYxJe6P4oYAerospace and defense is experiencing rapid growth. Unfortunately, most companies are struggling to use AI because of necessary data protections & compliance risk. These companies can move even faster if they could use the AI tools that most other industries take for granted.I spent most of my career prior to Consus in aerospace & defense. I launched national security payloads at SpaceX, and was an early employee at Castelion. I’ve watched first hand how compliance red-tape makes it difficult for companies to adopt new technologies and trust vendors that touch their sensitive data. For example, I worked with a satellite manufacturer that doesn’t allow any AI tools, even for non-sensitive work.Even as AI has become extremely useful over the past 9-12 months, I was surprised by how many aerospace & defense companies refused to touch it. They could see how it could be helpful, but they were scared about model providers training on their data, violating an ITAR rule, or risk losing new business because of a failed cyber assessment. These are all rational fears.There were a lot of ways to solve some/all of these problems, but we focused on building a compliant AI inference layer that can "plug" into any AI tool or workflow. Just as OpenRouter integrates with most tools, Consus can connect to tools like ChatGPT or Clau
AI
Questions about this idea?
FlyBot reads the scoring and gives you a second opinion on “Nari Qwen3-TTS and Qwen3-ASR – High accuracy, low latency and cost”.