Large Scale Article Extract of Newspapers 1730s-1960s
Hello HN, over the past 7 months I've spent nearly 3,000 hours on building SNEWPAPERS, the first historical newpaper archive with full-text extractions, nearly perfect OCR, a vast categorization taxonomy and of course with semantic and agentic search capabilities.Problem: I wanted to search through newspaper archives, but when I tried every service only lets you search for keywords and dates, and gives you back raw images of the papers, and too many of them with no context. A sea of noise.Solution: I taught machines how to read the newspapers and so far I've extracted the content from > 600k pages (about 5TB) from the Chronicling America collection. Problems I had to deal with were an infinite variety of layouts, font sizes, image scan qualities, resolutions, aspect ratios, navigating around the images on the page. I also had to figure out how to get OCR to be nearly perfect so people wouldn't hate reading the extracts. I stitched together a multi-model pipeline (layout tech, ocr tech, llm, vllm) with heuristics to go from layout -> segmentation -> classification. I put it all in OpenSearch / Postgres and made it semantically searchable and also put an agentic search tool on top that knows how to use the API really well and helps you write queries to find what you're looking for. Happy to discuss AWS architecture and scaling as well, that was tough!If you have five minutes and you just want to jump in and have your own personalized experience, what I would suggest is:Before searching for anything, go to the Sleuth page Ask it about anything from 1736 to 1963, maybe 1 or 2 follow up questions Then go to the search page so you can see the queries it wrote for you (bottom left "saved queries") and uncover more info on whatever it is you're interested inIf you think it's cool and you want to learn more, then there's about 10 minutes of video guides on the various capabilities in "Guide" on the n
FL score
out of 100
Verdict
medium confidence
Competition
No competitor data yet
Trend
No signal yet
AI-powered full-text searchable newspaper archive (1730s-1960s) with semantic search and agentic query assistance, solving the discovery problem in historical research.
The pain
The gap
Build angle
Strengths
- Exceptional technical depth, solved hard problems (layout detection, OCR quality, multi-model orchestration) that competitors haven't
- Solved a real UX problem, semantic + agentic search is genuinely better than keyword-only
- Defensible moat potential, 600k pages + trained models create switching costs
- Clear demo-ability, users can immediately experience value vs. existing tools
- Addresses multiple use cases: academic research, genealogy, journalism, local history
Risks
- Unclear monetization, no pricing model mentioned; unclear if users will pay vs. using free Chronicling America
- TAM uncertainty, addressable market may be smaller than assumed (academic institutions, genealogy enthusiasts, niche researchers)
- Scaling challenges, 3,000 hours for 600k pages suggests high cost-per-page; unclear if economics work at scale
- Legal/licensing ambiguity, Chronicling America is public domain, but derivative works and commercial use may face friction
- Competition risk, Google Books, Internet Archive, and institutional archives could add semantic search; low switching costs for users
- Retention unknown, one-time research tool vs. recurring platform; unclear if users return
- Feature creep trap, agentic search is cool but may not be the core value driver
Fly Labs Method
Is the pain real, is there a gap, is it the right time, can one person build it.
Value Equation
Dream outcome and how likely it feels, against the time and effort it costs.
One-Person Business
Curiosity pull, identity fit, and a path from free value to paid for a solo creator.
Viral Frameworks
Hook strength, shareability, and how cheaply it can be tested.
Builder Lens
Evidence the problem exists, timing, defensibility, and a model that fits on a napkin.
Five lenses, one composite. How scoring works
The angle
No market research recorded for this idea yet.
Semble – Code search for agents that uses 98% fewer tokens than grep
Hey HN! We (Stephan and Thomas) recently open-sourced Semble. We kept running into the same problem while using Claude Code on large codebases: when the agent can't find something directly, it falls back to grep, reading full files or launching subagents. This uses a lot of tokens, and often still misses the relevant code. There are existing tools for this, but they were either too slow to index on demand, needed API keys, or had poor retrieval quality.Semble is our solution for this. It combines static Model2Vec embeddings (using our latest static model: potion-code-16M) with BM25, fused via RRF and reranked with code-aware signals. Everything runs on CPU since there's no transformers involved. On our benchmark of ~1250 query/document pairs across 63 repos and 19 languages, it uses 98% fewer tokens than grep+read and reaches 99% of the retrieval quality of a 137M-parameter code-trained transformer, while being ~200x faster.Main features:- Token-efficient: 98% fewer tokens than grep+read- Fast: ~250ms to index a typical repo on our benchmark, ~1.5ms per query on CPU (very large repos may take longer)- Accurate: 0.854 NDCG@10, 99% of the best transformer setup we tested- MCP server: drop-in for Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, OpenCode- Zero config: no API keys, no GPU, no external servicesInstall in Claude Code with: claude mcp add semble -s user -- uvx --from "semble[mcp]" sembleOr check our README for other installation instructions, benchmarks, and methodology:Semble: https://github.com/MinishLab/sembleBenchmarks: https://github.com/MinishLab/semble/tree/main/benchmarksModel: https://huggingface.co/minishlab/potion-code-16MLet us know if you have any feedback or questions!
AI
Postgres extension for BM25 relevance-ranked full-text search
Last summer we faced a conundrum at my company, Tiger Data, a Postgres cloud vendor whose main business is in timeseries data. We were trying to grow our business towards emerging AI-centric workloads and wanted to provide a state-of-the-art hybrid search stack in Postgres. We'd already built pgvectorscale in house with the goal of scaling semantic search beyond pgvector's main memory limitations. We just needed a scalable ranked keyword search solution too.The problem: core Postgres doesn't provide this; the leading Postgres BM25 extension, ParadeDB, is guarded behind AGPL; developing our own extension appeared daunting. We'd need a small team of sharp engineers and 6-12 months, I figured. And we'd probably still fall short of the performance of a mature system like Parade/Tantivy.Or would we? I'd be experimenting long enough with AI-boosted development at that point to realize that with the latest tools (Claude Code + Opus) and an experienced hand (I've been working in database systems internals for 25 years now), the old time estimates pretty much go out the window.I told our CTO I thought I could solo the project in one quarter. This raised some eyebrows.It did take a little more time than that (two quarters), and we got some real help from the community (amazing!) after open-sourcing the pre-release. But I'm thrilled/exhausted today to share that pg_textsearch v1.0 is freely available via open source (Postgres license), on Tiger Data cloud, and hopefully soon, a hyperscalar near you:https://github.com/timescale/pg_textsearchIn the blog post accompanying the release, I overview the architecture and present benchmark results using MS-MARCO. To my surprise, we were not only able to meet Parade/Tantivy's query performance, but exceed it substantially, measuring a 4.7x advantage on query throughput at scale:https://www.tigerdata.com/blog/pg-textsearch-bm25-fu
AI
Consus (YC F24) – LLM gateway for companies handling sensitive data
Hey Hacker News! I'm Eric, the founder of Consus. We route all AI requests to ITAR restricted and controlled unclassified information (CUI) compliant infrastructure. Consus itself satisfies ITAR restrictions, and we recently completed our FedRAMP equivalency audit against the 410 FedRAMP High controls. FedRAMP High is the U.S. government’s strictest security baseline for cloud services handling sensitive unclassified data. A breach of this data could cause severe or catastrophic harm. Achieving FedRAMP equivalency, or authorization, is required before processing CUI information.Demo: https://youtu.be/6MYxJe6P4oYAerospace and defense is experiencing rapid growth. Unfortunately, most companies are struggling to use AI because of necessary data protections & compliance risk. These companies can move even faster if they could use the AI tools that most other industries take for granted.I spent most of my career prior to Consus in aerospace & defense. I launched national security payloads at SpaceX, and was an early employee at Castelion. I’ve watched first hand how compliance red-tape makes it difficult for companies to adopt new technologies and trust vendors that touch their sensitive data. For example, I worked with a satellite manufacturer that doesn’t allow any AI tools, even for non-sensitive work.Even as AI has become extremely useful over the past 9-12 months, I was surprised by how many aerospace & defense companies refused to touch it. They could see how it could be helpful, but they were scared about model providers training on their data, violating an ITAR rule, or risk losing new business because of a failed cyber assessment. These are all rational fears.There were a lot of ways to solve some/all of these problems, but we focused on building a compliant AI inference layer that can "plug" into any AI tool or workflow. Just as OpenRouter integrates with most tools, Consus can connect to tools like ChatGPT or Clau
AI
Questions about this idea?
FlyBot reads the scoring and gives you a second opinion on “Large Scale Article Extract of Newspapers 1730s-1960s”.