No platform to invest directly in promising individuals like equity shares: SKIP, 35/100 | Ideas Lab

A platform for investing in individuals' future earnings, similar to equity crowdfunding but for people instead of companies.

The pain

People with capital want exposure to talented individuals they know. Talented individuals need funding but lack access to traditional venture capital or loans. Currently, this happens informally through loans, gifts, or handshake deals with no structure.

The gap

No regulated marketplace exists for fractional ownership of human capital earnings. The legal, tax, and enforcement infrastructure doesn't exist. Contracts would need to specify what 'success' means, how earnings are tracked, and how disputes are resolved.

Build angle

Start narrow: focus on a specific profession with predictable earnings (software engineers, consultants, athletes) where you can create standardized contracts. Build the legal framework first, then the platform. Charge a percentage of earnings as the business model.

Strengths

Addresses a real coordination problem between capital and talent
Network effects could be strong once trust is established
Multiple revenue streams: platform fees, escrow services, legal templates
Talent gets funding without diluting equity or taking debt

Risks

Severe regulatory uncertainty, SEC may classify this as securities, requiring expensive licensing
Moral hazard: investors have incentive to interfere with or sabotage earnings
Enforcement nightmare: how do you verify someone's actual earnings or prevent them from hiding income?
Tax complexity: unclear how IRS treats fractional human capital ownership
Reputational damage if early deals go bad or feel exploitative
Chicken-and-egg problem: need both investors and talented individuals to trust the platform simultaneously
Legal liability if contracts are poorly written or disputes arise

Fly Labs Method

Is the pain real, is there a gap, is it the right time, can one person build it.

35

Value Equation

Dream outcome and how likely it feels, against the time and effort it costs.

28

One-Person Business

Curiosity pull, identity fit, and a path from free value to paid for a solo creator.

42

Viral Frameworks

Hook strength, shareability, and how cheaply it can be tested.

38

Builder Lens

Evidence the problem exists, timing, defensibility, and a model that fits on a napkin.

45

Five lenses, one composite. How scoring works

The angle

Start narrow: focus on a specific profession with predictable earnings (software engineers, consultants, athletes) where you can create standardized contracts. Build the legal framework first, then the platform. Charge a percentage of earnings as the business model.

No market research recorded for this idea yet.

Small businesses need automated accounting but existing solutions are too complex or expensive

Small businesses, especially in emerging markets, struggle with manual bookkeeping and can't afford complex accounting software or professional services.

Finance

BUILD

87FL score

Disability benefit recipients need clarity on vehicle allowance rule changes

PIP recipients face new £400 charges due to Motability mileage allowance changes. Many don't understand the impact or have time to research. A tool could aggregate rule changes, calculate personal impact, and guide users through options. [Trending: "motability mileage allowance" with 500+ searches in GB]

Finance

BUILD

85FL score

Traders lack real-time average weighted funding rate tracker for Hyperliquid positions

HyperliquidX traders struggle to calculate and track average weighted funding rates for their long and short positions in real-time, leading to inaccurate risk assessment and unexpected costs as no dedicated tool exists.

Finance

BUILD

85FL score

All Finance ideas