Vela (YC W26) – AI for complex scheduling
Hi HN! We're Gobhanu and Saatvik (brothers), building Vela (https://tryvela.ai) - AI agents that handle multi-party, multi-channel scheduling.Scheduling is a constraint satisfaction problem disguised as email! It’s easy when it’s two people, one timezone, one channel. But it becomes a constraint satisfaction problem when inputs are unstructured natural language across multiple communication channels, constraints change mid-solve, and the objective function includes social dynamics that don't exist formally anywhere.What if scheduling just happened? For example: a recruiter sends one message, and every interview across five candidates, three hiring managers, and two time zones gets booked, confirmed, and updated automatically. No links, no back-and-forth, no one spending hours with 20 emails. Everyone just gets the right invite at the right time, on whatever channel they actually use. That's what we built Vela to do.You loop in Vela into your emails, SMS, WhatsApp, Slack, phone or integrate into an ATS etc and it takes over: reads context, checks calendars, proposes times, follows up when people ghost, and rebooks when things shift.One of our first customers is a staffing firm that searched for a scheduling solution for almost eight years. Their coordinators manage hundreds of candidate-client interviews where each side needs separate email threads, separate Zoom accounts to avoid double-booking links, and calendar invites connecting parties who never directly communicate. A client reschedules one interview and it cascades into four others. A candidate responds on SMS to a thread that started on email. Vela solved this in just 10 minutes of onboarding.The hardest part has been the data problem. Scheduling behavior varies enormously across populations. C-suite folks respond to email within hours and expect formal 3-option proposals. Truck drivers applying for logistics roles respond to SMS at odd hours from shared devices with "y tm wrks.
FL score
out of 100
Verdict
high confidence
Competition
16
competitors found, emerging market, funded players
Trend
8 community mentions
An AI agent for complex, multi-party, multi-channel scheduling using unstructured natural language, primarily for industries like staffing.
The pain
The gap
Build angle
Strengths
- Addresses an extremely painful and specific problem with high severity.
- Clear market gap for a truly autonomous, multi-channel AI scheduling agent.
- Strong signals of willingness to pay (8-year search, 10-minute onboarding success).
- High value proposition for businesses saving significant operational time and cost.
- Future-proof concept aligned with AI automation trends.
Risks
- Extremely high technical complexity for a solo builder, especially with natural language processing and multi-channel integration reliability.
- The 'data problem' of scheduling behavior varying enormously poses a significant challenge for AI agent robustness.
- Crowded general scheduling market means clear differentiation and proof of AI capabilities are crucial.
- Achieving robust performance across diverse, unstructured inputs is difficult and prone to edge cases.
- Creator fit for a solo builder is low due to the complexity.
Next steps
- Deeply validate the willingness to pay and exact pain points with 10-20 more potential customers, beyond the initial staffing firm, to ensure the problem is widespread and not an outlier.
- Prioritize the core communication channels and the narrowest, highest-impact use case (e.g., email + SMS for recruitment) for an absolute MVP.
- Explore existing AI/NLP APIs and orchestration layers to reduce build complexity, rather than building everything from scratch.
- Focus on a specific, measurable outcome (e.g., 'reduces scheduling time by X% for Y role') and track it with early adopters.
Fly Labs Method
Is the pain real, is there a gap, is it the right time, can one person build it.
- Problem clarity
- 26
- Solution gap
- 20
- Willingness to pay
- 19
- Buildability
- 12
High-value problem with a clear gap, but significant build complexity for a solo founder.
Value Equation
Dream outcome and how likely it feels, against the time and effort it costs.
Strong market need and clear value proposition with a good moat, but high technical build complexity.
One-Person Business
Curiosity pull, identity fit, and a path from free value to paid for a solo creator.
A clear, specific problem with good monetization potential, but high build complexity and uncertain solo-creator fit.
Viral Frameworks
Hook strength, shareability, and how cheaply it can be tested.
Strong target audience and value proposition for a micro-SaaS, but high technical and adoption risks requiring continuous validation.
Builder Lens
Evidence the problem exists, timing, defensibility, and a model that fits on a napkin.
Strong demand, clear pain, specific wedge, and future-proof concept, but the 'observation and surprise' and 'future fit' need more unique insights.
Why this verdict
Five lenses, one composite. How scoring works
The angle
This weekend
- Deeply validate the willingness to pay and exact pain points with 10-20 more potential customers, beyond the initial staffing firm, to ensure the problem is widespread and not an outlier.
- Prioritize the core communication channels and the narrowest, highest-impact use case (e.g., email + SMS for recruitment) for an absolute MVP.
- Explore existing AI/NLP APIs and orchestration layers to reduce build complexity, rather than building everything from scratch.
- Focus on a specific, measurable outcome (e.g., 'reduces scheduling time by X% for Y role') and track it with early adopters.
Who is already there, emerging market
Calendly is a widely used scheduling tool that allows individuals and teams to automate meeting bookings.
Pricing: Free plan; Standard: $10/user/month (billed annually); Teams: $16/user/month (billed annually); Enterprise: Custom pricing.
Chili Piper is a scheduling and routing platform focused on helping B2B revenue teams convert demand into qualified meetings.
Pricing: Chili Piper offers subscription plans based on its product functionalities (Instant Booker, Handoff, Form Concierge, Distro); no free trial or freemium option publicly listed, though some sources are contradictory.
SavvyCal is a scheduling tool that focuses on a collaborative booking experience by allowing recipients to overlay their calendars on yours.
Pricing: Free plan (limited); Basic: $12/user/month (billed annually); Premium: $20/user/month (billed annually).
Doodle is a popular scheduling tool known for its polling feature, allowing groups to find mutually convenient meeting times.
Pricing: Doodle offers paid plans, with most conferencing integrations available on these plans. (Specific pricing numbers not found in results)
Clockwise uses AI to optimize team calendars, create focus time, and automatically schedule meetings.
Pricing: Free: $0; Teams: $6.75/user/month (billed annually); Business: $11.50/user/month (billed annually); Enterprise: Custom pricing.
Reclaim.ai is an AI calendar assistant that intelligently blocks time for tasks and habits, and finds the best times for meetings.
Pricing: (Pricing not found directly in search results, but mentioned in comparison with Sunsama alternatives.)
Motion is an intelligent daily planner that automatically builds and optimizes your schedule using AI for tasks and meetings.
Pricing: $29+/month.
- SunsamaVisit
Sunsama is a daily planning tool that guides users through setting a daily plan by integrating tasks and calendars.
Pricing: $25/month per person (monthly) or $20/month per person (yearly, billed annually); no free plan, but a 14-day free trial.
Homebase is a software solution for tracking hours, scheduling, and payroll for local businesses and employees.
Pricing: Basic: $0 (1 location, up to 20 employees); Essentials: $30/location/month; Plus: $70/location/month; All-in-One: $120/location/month (all billed monthly). Payroll is an add-on for $39 base fee/month + $6/employee paid/month.
Deputy is a workforce management solution that streamlines scheduling, time tracking, and communication for businesses.
Pricing: (Pricing not explicitly found in search results, but mentioned as an alternative to When I Work.)
When I Work is an employee scheduling and time tracking software.
Pricing: Offers a free version for basic scheduling. (Specific paid plan pricing not explicitly found in search results.)
Jiminny is a conversation intelligence platform designed for coaching sales representatives.
Pricing: A 10-person team pays ~$9,960/year for 10 recording seats. (Enterprise-level pricing common.)
What they charge
What people say, 8 mentions
Some of the most successful founders I've worked with never played by the "startup rules" everyone posts about
r/SaaS
PE is dumping billions into home care despite 79% caregiver turnover. Heres why.
r/Entrepreneur
PART 1: YOU MUST READ THIS, I SPENT 3 YEARS BUILDING A COMPLEX PRODUCT… AND MADE ZERO SALES, ZERO MRR.
r/SaaS
After deploying AI agents for 100+ companies, here's why 90% of voice AI implementations fail (and it's not the technology)
r/Entrepreneur
You looking to buy these AI hyped Saas but smart money is betting somewhere else
r/Entrepreneur
Stop making stupid SaaS and start solving real niche problems
r/SaaS
I spent 6 months analysing 847 startups that build products customers said they wanted. 92% failed anyway. The ones that won did the OPPOSITE of user feedback. This is Part 2/5: The Product Truths. (My product team stopped speaking to me.)
r/SaaS
What expensive software are you using that you wish had a free/open-source alternative?
r/Entrepreneur
Recent news
8 Best SavvyCal Alternatives for Smarter Scheduling - Skej
Skej, March 16, 2026
Best SavvyCal Alternatives: Beyond Personalized Booking Pages
SaaS Landing Page (Alfred_AI), February 25, 2026
Clockwise Pricing in 2026: Plans, Cost & What You Actually Get - alfred_ AI
Alfred_AI, February 24, 2026
Sunsama Pricing: Is It Worth It in 2026? - alfred
Alfred_AI, February 24, 2026
Homebase Pricing: A Comprehensive Guide | Capterra
Capterra, February 19, 2026
Market signals
The market for complex scheduling is large and growing, with a clear trend towards AI-powered solutions that automate and optimize schedules across multiple parties and channels. Recent news indicates a strong focus on individual and team productivity, with many tools offering features to protect focus time and streamline meeting coordination. There's also a clear need for advanced routing and lead qualification in B2B sales. Funding rounds are frequent, indicating investor interest in this space.
What frustrates people
- Calendly is seen as a generic tool lacking sophisticated lead qualification, routing, and reporting for B2B revenue teams.
- Chili Piper's CRM owner logic struggles at scale, and its form integrations are rigid.
- Users complain about having to manually interfere with round-robin lead assignment in Calendly and Qualified when there are no-shows or cancellations.
- SavvyCal's free plan is extremely limited, and it lacks AI features.
- Sunsama has no permanent free tier, a relatively high price point, and requires significant manual planning, lacking automation for aspects like email management.
Semble – Code search for agents that uses 98% fewer tokens than grep
Hey HN! We (Stephan and Thomas) recently open-sourced Semble. We kept running into the same problem while using Claude Code on large codebases: when the agent can't find something directly, it falls back to grep, reading full files or launching subagents. This uses a lot of tokens, and often still misses the relevant code. There are existing tools for this, but they were either too slow to index on demand, needed API keys, or had poor retrieval quality.Semble is our solution for this. It combines static Model2Vec embeddings (using our latest static model: potion-code-16M) with BM25, fused via RRF and reranked with code-aware signals. Everything runs on CPU since there's no transformers involved. On our benchmark of ~1250 query/document pairs across 63 repos and 19 languages, it uses 98% fewer tokens than grep+read and reaches 99% of the retrieval quality of a 137M-parameter code-trained transformer, while being ~200x faster.Main features:- Token-efficient: 98% fewer tokens than grep+read- Fast: ~250ms to index a typical repo on our benchmark, ~1.5ms per query on CPU (very large repos may take longer)- Accurate: 0.854 NDCG@10, 99% of the best transformer setup we tested- MCP server: drop-in for Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, OpenCode- Zero config: no API keys, no GPU, no external servicesInstall in Claude Code with: claude mcp add semble -s user -- uvx --from "semble[mcp]" sembleOr check our README for other installation instructions, benchmarks, and methodology:Semble: https://github.com/MinishLab/sembleBenchmarks: https://github.com/MinishLab/semble/tree/main/benchmarksModel: https://huggingface.co/minishlab/potion-code-16MLet us know if you have any feedback or questions!
AI
Postgres extension for BM25 relevance-ranked full-text search
Last summer we faced a conundrum at my company, Tiger Data, a Postgres cloud vendor whose main business is in timeseries data. We were trying to grow our business towards emerging AI-centric workloads and wanted to provide a state-of-the-art hybrid search stack in Postgres. We'd already built pgvectorscale in house with the goal of scaling semantic search beyond pgvector's main memory limitations. We just needed a scalable ranked keyword search solution too.The problem: core Postgres doesn't provide this; the leading Postgres BM25 extension, ParadeDB, is guarded behind AGPL; developing our own extension appeared daunting. We'd need a small team of sharp engineers and 6-12 months, I figured. And we'd probably still fall short of the performance of a mature system like Parade/Tantivy.Or would we? I'd be experimenting long enough with AI-boosted development at that point to realize that with the latest tools (Claude Code + Opus) and an experienced hand (I've been working in database systems internals for 25 years now), the old time estimates pretty much go out the window.I told our CTO I thought I could solo the project in one quarter. This raised some eyebrows.It did take a little more time than that (two quarters), and we got some real help from the community (amazing!) after open-sourcing the pre-release. But I'm thrilled/exhausted today to share that pg_textsearch v1.0 is freely available via open source (Postgres license), on Tiger Data cloud, and hopefully soon, a hyperscalar near you:https://github.com/timescale/pg_textsearchIn the blog post accompanying the release, I overview the architecture and present benchmark results using MS-MARCO. To my surprise, we were not only able to meet Parade/Tantivy's query performance, but exceed it substantially, measuring a 4.7x advantage on query throughput at scale:https://www.tigerdata.com/blog/pg-textsearch-bm25-fu
AI
Consus (YC F24) – LLM gateway for companies handling sensitive data
Hey Hacker News! I'm Eric, the founder of Consus. We route all AI requests to ITAR restricted and controlled unclassified information (CUI) compliant infrastructure. Consus itself satisfies ITAR restrictions, and we recently completed our FedRAMP equivalency audit against the 410 FedRAMP High controls. FedRAMP High is the U.S. government’s strictest security baseline for cloud services handling sensitive unclassified data. A breach of this data could cause severe or catastrophic harm. Achieving FedRAMP equivalency, or authorization, is required before processing CUI information.Demo: https://youtu.be/6MYxJe6P4oYAerospace and defense is experiencing rapid growth. Unfortunately, most companies are struggling to use AI because of necessary data protections & compliance risk. These companies can move even faster if they could use the AI tools that most other industries take for granted.I spent most of my career prior to Consus in aerospace & defense. I launched national security payloads at SpaceX, and was an early employee at Castelion. I’ve watched first hand how compliance red-tape makes it difficult for companies to adopt new technologies and trust vendors that touch their sensitive data. For example, I worked with a satellite manufacturer that doesn’t allow any AI tools, even for non-sensitive work.Even as AI has become extremely useful over the past 9-12 months, I was surprised by how many aerospace & defense companies refused to touch it. They could see how it could be helpful, but they were scared about model providers training on their data, violating an ITAR rule, or risk losing new business because of a failed cyber assessment. These are all rational fears.There were a lot of ways to solve some/all of these problems, but we focused on building a compliant AI inference layer that can "plug" into any AI tool or workflow. Just as OpenRouter integrates with most tools, Consus can connect to tools like ChatGPT or Clau
AI
Questions about this idea?
FlyBot reads the scoring and gives you a second opinion on “Vela (YC W26) – AI for complex scheduling”.